Project VORTEX
Printable Narrative Report
Loading…

📄 Rainfall Simulation & Risk Report

Municipality:  ·  Structure:  ·  Return period: yr  ·  Date:

Prepared for: Local Government Unit (LGU), Camarines Norte  ·  Prepared by: Project VORTEX Research Team

Purpose: To provide a statistically grounded summary of simulated extreme rainfall, validate model performance against historical observations, and deliver evidence-based adaptation recommendations to support LGU infrastructure planning and disaster risk management.

📋 Executive Summary

Loading…

Reminder: All values are probabilistic estimates from Gumbel EVT and Monte Carlo simulation — planning guidance, not deterministic forecasts.

📊 Key Indicators

Loading…

Table 1 — Simulation Summary (Baseline Scenario)
IndicatorValueNotes

📈 Observed vs Simulated Rainfall

Figure 1 — Annual Maxima: Observed vs Sim. Mean ± 1 SD
Figure 2 — Gumbel Return Levels by Return Period
Table 2 — Per-Year Observed vs Simulated
YearObserved (mm)Sim. Mean (mm)±1 SDWithin ±1 SD?

Loading…

How to read: Observed values within Sim. Mean ± 1 SD indicate realistic model performance. ⬆ Above or ⬇ Below flags extreme or anomalously dry years for further investigation.

📐 Return Level Analysis

Loading…

Table 3 — Gumbel Return Level Estimates
Return Period (yr)Estimated Rainfall (mm/day)Planning Implication

🔬 Model Validation Results

Table 4 — Statistical Validation Tests
TestResultFormulaInterpretation
Wilcoxon Signed-RankW = Σ rank(|dᵢ|)
McNemar's Testχ² = (b−c)²/(b+c)
Spearman ρρ = 1 − 6Σdᵢ²/n(n²−1)
Coefficient of VariationCV = (σ/μ) × 100%

Loading…

📐 Goodness-of-Fit (Gumbel Distribution)

Table 5 — Goodness-of-Fit Tests
TestResultFormulaInterpretation
Kolmogorov–SmirnovD = sup|F₀(x)−Fₙ(x)|
Anderson–DarlingA² = −n−(1/n)Σ(2i−1)(lnF+ln(1−F'))

Loading…

K-S: p > 0.05 → Gumbel fits well.   A-D: A² < 1.0 → excellent; 1–2.5 → acceptable; > 2.5 → poor tail fit.

🛡️ Conclusions & Adaptation Recommendations

Loading…

Loading…